CQ has long tracked how often members of Congress vote with their parties (aka “party unity“), how often they vote with the president (“presidential support“), and how often they simply show up to vote (“voting participation“). These numbers shed a lot of light both on Congress as a whole and on individual members.
CQ has also launched a new flash-based tool which lets you view all this data interactively. Be sure to scroll all the way down for the chart which plots presidential supports vs. party unity – very cool. Hopefully CQ will go back and add historical data (they’ve been compiling these numbers since 1953). For now, you can find 2006 & 2007 party unity numbers here, and combined 2005-06 numbers here.
A few highlights:
- Nick Lampson had the lowest party unity score (57%) and the highest presidential support score (39%), but it still didn’t keep him from getting turfed in his extremely red Texas district
- Meanwhile, Nancy Boyda voted with the Dems 92% of the time – exactly average. That probably didn’t help her cause.
- Good news on the filibuster front: Olympia Snowe voted with the Democrats 61% of the time and Susan Collins did so 54% of the time. Yes, they both voted Dem more often than they went Repub (though Collins’s score might have been inflated by the fact that she sought re-election this year).
- Check out this chart (PDF), in particular the opposition column for the Senate. Most of the names on that list make sense, but one stands out: DE Sen. Tom Carper, who frequently has a poor party unity record. I’m sure I’m not the only person who expects more from a guy who represents a state which voted 62-37 for Obama.
- Tops on the dis-unity list: Evan Bayh, considerably worse than even Ben Nelson. Sheesh. What a phony. After racking up unity scores of 90% in 2005 and 89% in 2006 when he was flirting with a presidential run, he’s since cratered to 65%. Seems to me like he’s the epitome of a “stands for anything, stands for nothing” politician.
- Back on the House side of things, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen was second only to the primaried-out Wayne Gilchrest among Republicans voting with Dems, which shows you that a credible challenge at the polls can also do good things on the Hill.
- And not that anyone needed reminding, but David Broder and his fellow cult members are still living in fantasy land:
The extent of the shift [toward greater partisanship] may be amplified by tighter floor control exercised by leaders of the majority party, said Jon R. Bond, a political scientist at Texas A&M University. “The majority party just won’t bring a vote up unless they know they are going to win,” he said. More telling, Bond said, the partisanship of today is a return to traditional American party politics, while the relative comity that existed from the 1950s to the 1980s was the exception.
“Even after all these years of increases in party voting, it’s still not nearly as high as it was in the 19th century,” he said.
Anyhow, there’s a ton of great stuff here. Enjoy!
(Via Congress Matters)
He’s not one-tenth the man that his father was.
(Flame away.)
Did Boyda really lose for being a loyal Democrat? A shame because I liked her. I think her loss had more to do with the loss of the moderate women’s vote (which Boyda won on Sebelius’ coattails and the fact that Ryun was just plain nuts). Lynn Jenkins was the perfect candidate to steal those votes away.
Party unity score is surprisingly better than what you would think based on what you read on the internet. 89% Party Unity, higher than Mikulski, Rokefeller and Inoyue.
that escaped me, not that it makes a whole lot of difference…
But I think it would be interesting to look at party unity for only the most important votes of the year and see if any candidates’ scores are significantly different from their total party unity. I seem to recall Ben Nelson voting the wrong way on almost every big issue and I bet his surprisingly not that bad score is due to him racking up good votes on minor issues.
Maybe I just have misguided perceptions but I find it pretty hard to believe that Ben Nelson is a better democrat than Mikulski who seemingly is pretty progressive.
until I found out that the DCCC had stopped spending money for him.
Kratovil has an almost identical voting record to Gilchrest’s final years in Congress in MD-01. That seat is most likely to see the smallest effect of a switch in party control. Kratovil will have to be a centrist like Gilchrest to survive, which is perfectly acceptable given the district.